From Tim Snow

Race season is here. If you have a June or July event on the calendar, the fitness question is largely settled. The work is done. What happens between now and the start line is about showing up sharp — not squeezing in one more block your body can't absorb anyway.

This issue focuses on the things that actually move the needle right now. How training load decisions get made when the calendar can't make them for you. Why most athletes are building bricks wrong — and how one simple reframe changes the whole week. What it actually costs to swim, bike, and run, and how to build a fueling plan that accounts for the whole race, not just one segment. Race-week mental preparation for athletes who are going into a competitive field. And a full Five Cornerstones breakdown for Patriot Half on June 14th.

A lot in this issue. All of it earned its place. Let's do it.

The Throttle: How QT2 Decides How Much Training Is Enough

Most training plans tell you what to do. Very few tell you how hard to press the accelerator — or when to ease off. That's the question StressLogic was built to answer.

There's a question most training plans never actually answer. They give you workouts. Some of them explain why. Almost none of them address the variable that matters most week to week: how much is the right amount right now — for this athlete, in this week, carrying whatever fatigue and life stress they walked in with?

The standard default is a fixed calendar. Three weeks building, one week recovering, repeat. It's a reasonable structure. For some athletes in some periods, it works fine. But it's a calendar answer to a physiological question. The athlete who is absorbing training well at the end of week two doesn't need to stop building because the schedule says so. The athlete who is already showing signs of strain at the end of week one can't afford to push through two more because the plan hasn't reached its recovery week yet.

QT2's StressLogic Framework addresses this directly. Each week, the coach evaluates a combination of objective training data — discipline-specific CTL, ATL:CTL ratio, end-of-week TSB, 5-day TSB trend, workout execution quality — alongside subjective athlete feedback: motivation, soreness, sleep, life stress, orthopedic warning signs. The output is one of three directions: push, hold, or pull back.

"The plan sets the direction. StressLogic sets the throttle. Most athletes have a map. Very few have anyone managing the engine."

The value isn't complexity. It's precision. An athlete can have acceptable numbers on the Performance Management Chart while carrying fatigue that the numbers don't fully capture — poor sleep, elevated life stress, declining motivation, a nagging tightness building in the wrong place. Push the training forward anyway and you'll likely lose ten days to illness or a breakdown in four weeks. StressLogic creates the space for that judgment to happen before the damage is done.

Mid-season, when fitness is built and the races are close, this matters more than it did in January. The athletes who race well in July are managing training load right now — not in the final two weeks of taper. That management doesn't happen on a fixed calendar. It happens week by week, one push-hold-pull decision at a time.

The Three Directions

Push — athlete is absorbing well, a controlled increase is appropriate.

Hold — athlete is stable; maintain pressure, don't add to it.

Pull back — reduce load now to protect the next several weeks of training.

Brick as Default

Most athletes treat the brick as a special event. A long, demanding session done a few times before a race. We don't. At QT2, the brick isn't an occasion. It's just how the week is built.

Two things go wrong consistently with brick training. The first is pacing. Athletes finish a training ride and head out on the run at a pace that feels satisfying — but has nothing to do with what they'll sustain after 112 miles on race day. The brick run becomes a confidence exercise rather than a training tool. The legs need to learn patience. The mind needs to accept that running off the bike is supposed to feel like bricks, and holding back early is the only way to run well late.

The second problem is volume. Athletes build enormous brick sessions — four hours of riding into an hour of running — that generate training stress approaching a race. The body spends the next several days recovering from a session that was never meant to be a race. The week gets compromised. The pattern repeats.

The better model starts with a simple reframe: stop thinking about a brick session and start thinking about being in a constant state of running off the bike.

In a well-structured training week, there are multiple days where a ride and a run both appear. Most athletes do those separately. That's a missed opportunity. When the ride and run can be done sequentially without compromising the quality of either, they should be. A key ride on Tuesday followed by an easy run — brick. A quality ride on Thursday with an easy run — brick. Short. Easy. The legs feel like bricks for a few minutes, then find their rhythm. Over weeks and months of this, the transition stops being a shock.

"The brick isn't a session. It's a habit. When it becomes the default structure of the training week, it stops being something you prepare for and starts being something your legs just know how to do."

The weekend amplifies this. Long ride Saturday with a short easy run off the bike. Easy ride Sunday followed by the long run. Two brick days back to back — and Sunday's long run done on legs that have already been through Saturday's full block. That accumulated fatigue isn't a bug. It's the point. It's the closest thing in training to the back half of an IRONMAN marathon. And it's built in, every week, without a single heroic standalone session required.

One more thing worth stating clearly: if you're doing a brick, you don't get to underfuel the bike because it's a training ride. The brick is a fueling rehearsal as much as it's a physiological one. Fuel the bike the way you intend to race it. And take a gel before the run — at the transition, at home, wherever. That habit, installed in training, makes T2 automatic on race day.

The T2 Gel Is a Practice, Not a Detail

Every brick run should begin with a gel. Not a mile in when you remember — before you leave. At the moment you transition. If you can't build the habit in training, don't expect to execute it cleanly under race stress.

Keeping Gas in the Tank

A fueling plan shouldn't start with grams per hour. It should start with a balance sheet: what you have on board, what the race will cost by segment, and where you need to make deposits to stay out of trouble.

Most athletes build their fueling plan by asking one question: how many grams of carbohydrate per hour should I take? They get an answer — from a coach, a nutrition brand, a forum — and that number becomes the plan. The problem is that a grams-per-hour target is a tool. It's not a plan. And it's not the right place to start.

Think of race-day carbohydrate like a bank account. You start with a balance — glycogen stored from a proper carb load, topped off with a pre-race gel. The race makes withdrawals. The swim takes some before you can make any deposits. The bike takes a lot — it's the largest single withdrawal of the day. The run takes even more per minute than the bike, at the same time that it's the hardest place to take in nutrition effectively. You can make deposits throughout, but only at certain windows and only up to what the gut can absorb.

What matters is whether the account stays solvent. Not whether you finish on a full tank — nobody does. Whether you avoided hitting the point where performance becomes fragile and the race shifts from execution to survival.

"Don't ask how many grams per hour first. Ask what the race will cost, what you're starting with, and where you need to make deposits."

Here's what that looks like for a real athlete. A 160-pound male racing a 70.3 is looking at roughly 105 grams spent in the swim, 493 grams on the bike, and 354 grams on the run. A well-loaded athlete of his size starts with around 545 grams on board. The gross deficit — what he needs from on-course intake — is approximately 377 grams.

Work backward from the run. A realistic intake on the run is around 55 grams per hour — gut-limited, harder to absorb under run stress. Over 85 minutes, that's about 75 grams. A gel in T2 — 30 grams. A gel in T1 — 30 grams. Those two choices, each taking ten seconds, cover 60 grams of the deficit without touching the bike at all. What remains is what the bike must cover: roughly 242 grams over 2:15, which comes to about 107 grams per hour.

That's at the upper edge of what a well-trained gut can handle. Which means every deposit window matters. Skip T1 and the bike requirement climbs to 121 grams per hour — unreachable for most athletes. Skip T2 as well, and you're asking the bike to solve a math problem it can't solve. Fueling is a choice. Every deposit window is a decision. The athletes who understand that arrive at T2 with something left. The athletes who don't are usually fine until they're not.

The Carb Load Is Non-Negotiable

Every number in the balance sheet assumes a well-executed pre-race carbohydrate load. Arrive undertanked and the deficit grows before the gun goes off. There is no on-course fueling strategy that compensates for starting with a partially empty tank. Take the carb load as seriously as the taper.

Race Your Numbers, Not the Field

A championship field changes the atmosphere. It doesn't change what your power targets should be on mile one of the bike.

When the field around you is faster and deeper than a typical regional race — as it will be at Patriot with the USAT National Championship designation — the mental dynamic shifts. Athletes who race their own numbers stay in control. Athletes who react to the field around them spend energy they haven't earned yet, and pay for it later in a way that's very visible and very demoralizing to everyone behind them.

The athletes who struggle at championship-level races almost always do it early. They see fast people going fast, and their effort creeps above target. Not dramatically — just enough. Five extra watts on the bike through the first loop. A run pace that feels appropriate given how everyone around them is moving. By mile 10 of the run, the account is overdrawn. The fitness was there. The execution wasn't.

The process goal framework is the practical fix. Before race morning, define two or three specific execution anchors — things that are entirely within your control regardless of what the field does. Your target power range on the first loop. Your run pace for the first two miles. Your fueling interval on the bike. These are not outcomes. They are behaviors. And behaviors are executable under stress in a way that outcome goals are not.

"The athlete who races their process beats the athlete who races their anxiety. Every time."

When the race gets hard — and it will, somewhere around mile 40 on the bike or mile 10 on the run — the internal conversation will turn. The question is whether you have something pre-loaded to replace it with. A specific cue. A single word. A target you can return to. Confidence before a race isn't the absence of nerves. It's the presence of a plan you've already rehearsed — and the decision to execute it regardless of what's happening around you.

Define your execution anchors before race morning — power range, early run pace, fueling intervals
Seed yourself accurately at the swim start — not where ego puts you, where your actual pace puts you
When the internal conversation goes negative, come back to the process: next aid station, next mile marker, next gel
Race the moment you're in — split the race into segments and be fully present in each one

Patriot Half — June 13, 2026

Twenty years in. A USAT National Championship designation. Long Pond is still beautiful at 7am. The roads through Middleborough are still quiet. The course hasn't gotten any easier.

The Patriot Half has been New England's best long-course triathlon for two decades. In 2026 it earns its most significant stage yet: the USAT Long Course National Championship. That designation changes the field. Expect faster athletes, sharper competition, and qualification slots on the line for the 2027 Long Course World Championship. The course itself hasn't changed its character. The swim is clean. The bike is flatter than most 70.3 courses — but not flat, and the rolling terrain across 54 miles accumulates cost quietly. The run is a single loop with enough grade to find whatever you have left, capped by one ill-timed hill at mile 12.5.

The swim is a counterclockwise rectangle in Long Pond, fresh water, easy sighting, rolling time-trial start. Seed accurately. Seed where your actual swim pace puts you, not where your ego does. Draft off similar-speed swimmers. In the final 100 yards, add light leg kicking to drive blood flow into the legs before you stand up and run to transition.

The bike has one defining structural feature: the double-loop section, ridden twice inside the 54-mile course. Know The Merge at mile 12 and The Split at miles 30 and 50 before you need to navigate them at race pace in a group. The athletes who surge every grade and soft-pedal every descent are spending energy they haven't earned yet. The athletes who ride smooth, consistent power collect. Target 80–85% of CP for the main effort, climbs capped around 110%. If you think you can hold a given wattage for the full 54 miles at mile 5, back off 2–3% from that number. This course will find you if you don't.

The run begins with a physiology lesson. Start 5% slower than your target pace. Mile one will feel wrong regardless of how well you biked. By mile three, you'll forget there was a bike course. Plan for this — don't fight it. The late hill at mile 12.5 will find whatever you have left. Shorten your stride, maintain effort, don't blow up there. The finish line is close.

"The bike decides the run. What you do in the first loop determines whether you're racing the second half — or surviving it."

This is a USAT National Championship, which means the field will be faster and deeper than a typical regional 70.3. Race your numbers. Your power targets, your pace targets, your fueling intervals — those are what matter, regardless of what's moving around you in the first miles. The athletes still running well at mile 11 are the athletes who raced their own race from mile one of the bike. Not a single one of them got there by reacting to the field.

QT2 Systems Coaching
Seven weeks to IMLP. Patriot in two.
The athletes racing well in July are managing load right now.

If your training isn't adapting to how you're actually responding — week by week, not just on paper — there's a better way.

Back to blog